Snowblower Forum banner

1 - 15 of 15 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
166 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Hi

Long time ago, Ariens used impellers with 4 blades. Later some had six blades and now they have 3 blades like most snowblowers.

In theory, I suppose 6 blades should move more snow. Why most manufacturers use 3 blades on impellers now ?

Do blade number on impellers really change something with snow projection distance ?

Thanks
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
271 Posts
I often wondered this myself. My own personal guess is that the benefits simply don't outweigh the cost - it almost has to be the reason because otherwise, they'd do it.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
474 Posts
The impeller housing space is a finite number and with more blades it is taking up valuable real estate so to speak, in theory I think one would want the least amount of blades to get the job done. This is a good engineering exercise question as to what works best and why and as usual would defer to what the top tier machines use, it being 3 or 4 blades. But in reality cost will be a factor.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,221 Posts
snowblowers-hack, cough, gag, and impeller paddles

Hi,

Long time ago, Ariens used impellers with 4 blades. Later some had six blades and now they have 3 blades like most snowblowers.
In theory, I suppose 6 blades should move more snow.
Why most manufacturers use 3 blades on impellers now?
Do blade number on impellers really change something with snow projection distance ?

Thanks
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It all has to do with the amount of available torque to the snow throwers drive train as you are transmitting the
available torque to pulleys with a primary drive pulley to one or more driven pulleys for the snow blowers transmission and the impeller that is also tasked with providing torque to the worm to spur gear drive for the cross augers that feed the snow to the impeller "fan" paddles

To help everyone understand this issue better the reader needs to think of a snowblower-hack, cough, gag, as a pump.

It could be considered a fan and is referred to as a fan by some, but it does not have a high speed of rotation like a true ventilation fan as it has a limited amount of torque available to the impeller paddles due to the
additional need to power the cross augers that feed the impeller.

The use of an extended propeller shaft with a worm gear provides the builder with a very efficient way to provide power to the cross auger assembly that is protected with shear pins.

If a walk behind snowblower had one speed with a high horsepower V twin engine or my favorite the Wisconsin V-4 engine the snow would be no match for the snow blower at any time.

The issue remains that the builder of these machines needs to create a product from the ground up within a specific clearing width and any walk behind self propelled snow blower has an a air cooled engine is required to become a machine that accomplishes three jobs: the first is propulsion, the second is the breaking of the snow pack with the serrated or smooth cross auger, BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, and the third job is to rotate the impeller fan paddles at a reduced speed of rotation via the belt drive in most models with the Yamaha YS1028EJ? as an exception.

A two stage walk behind snow blower is essentially an energy sucking vampire that works and is offered at various retail prices for the homeowner or commercial user.

A two stage snow blower creates a lot of friction and heat when clearing snow as the cross auger is cutting and pushing the snow pack forward and the impeller is casting it upward and through the chute and spout to be disposed of.

The amount of built up heat created by the use of a 2 stage snow blower is transmitted to the surrounding area of the snow blowers impeller and the impeller housing and the cross auger simply from the friction created by the rotation of the cross auger.

The three current Yamaha models overcome this by lining the impeller housing and chute with slick sheet material. If all the builders did this it would solve a lot problems for the home owner and commercial user.


ME I hope my snow blower gets stolen as its junk in my opinion and I wish I had a single stage John Deere or an old IHC Cub Cadet lawn tractor with a single stage snow blower like the one I grew up with.

The other issue is the condition of the snow pack or ice and snow that the End Of Driveway Demons leave us after every time the road is plowed and salt is used.

The exceptions are the large walk behind tracked snowblowers made by Zaugg, and the Japanese manufacturers.

If all 2 stage snow blowers were built as was done with our fellow members frankenblower with a V twin engine was installed the issue of torque loss would no longer be an issue.


Me, I would prefer to see a smaller solid cross auger with narrow serrated flighting that would meter a specific amount of snow to the impeller housing. By simply lining the chute and spout with slick sheet material the builders of these things would sell a lot of snow blowers. as the slick lining material would generate more sales as people want to get rid of snow period.


:surprise:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,052 Posts
Well written leonz. IMHO it is marketing hype. I know that Husky touts a 4 blade cast iron impeller. Torque, torque, torque, pulley design a dual belt drive system like Ariens uses are all good things. A higher capacity 14" impeller is also a plus if you have the power to go with it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,221 Posts
Thank you for the compliment, I only get worse with much more detail when I talk about flail mowers and how much better and safer they are than bush hogs for grass and brush mowing.


I just wish that they(someone) would make a larger walk behind with a single stage system like our old IHC Cub Cadet with a chain final drive that had a 12 horsepower engine.

The design would be simple enough with a belt drive to the one to one right angle bevel gearbox and a cross shaft to the 40 or 60H drive sprocket and then 40 or 60H size cotter pinned single roller chain to the driven sprocket that would spin the snow blower rotor.

Its a no brainer for me and it would be simple enough;

3,300 RPM engine speed at the crank shaft to a small V belt drive to the right angle gearbox with a the small V belt to bring it down to 5 to 1 being 660 rpm and then to the cross shaft to the drive sprocket where the drive sprocket would be running at 500 rpm and the driven sprocket would be rotating at 300-375 RPM.

The solid snow blower rotor is bolted to external open flange roller bearings on the side weldments just the cubs single stage units were and it had a simple hand crank with a wire cable weaved around the base of the chute in 2 wraps from what I remember of it.


The issue would be the type of transmission and the 4 speed belt driven transmissions would be ideal for this as they have a full reversing transmission on all four speeds.

The large Toro recycler mowers 48 inch-60 inch have belt driven wheels. A track drive system could be used as the the 4 speed transmission allows the operator to brake left or right independently of the other wheel while operating in forward or reverse.











:angel:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,221 Posts
Hello Legarem,

You are most welcome. I doubt that I will every see it but if they employed a pair of impellers and chutes for a walk behinds
cross auger housing the price would scare people and it would be able to clear snow at least twice as fast and throw it twice as far as the loading on the impeller would be cut in half.

An even simpler single stage design would employ Beilhack snow clearing disc with 4 snow scoops and a very small snow and ice breaking propeller in front of the snow disc and it would use a larger V twin engine to spin the snow clearing disc through a five to one reducing gearbox that would allow the snow clearing disc to rotate at <660 RPM at 3,300 RPM.
The chute and spout would have to be larger in open area and have thicker metal to withstand the impact of the larger volume of snow that the snow clearing disc would remove.

Fun to dream anyway.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
666 Posts
Well my thinking is... since Ariens uses a skimpy (looking) 3 blade impeller design now and they are getting a 50' throw, results have to be in the impeller design and size along with the RPM of the impeller that allows a lot of snow in and out of the impeller area quickly. If you are using a machine that has a beefier/thicker steel 6 blade impeller, there is obviously less room in the impeller area for snow. I personally think going up to a 14" impeller size is a huge reason why snow can get in and out of the machine quicker. I do not know the diameter size of the 6 balde impeller.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
983 Posts
The Ariens Machines with a 6 Blade Impeller have a Larger Diameter Impeller compared to the 24" Machines. In My Experiences with them, The 6 Blade Machines Throw Exceptionally Well.
In the spring of 2018 I installed the 6 bladed impeller from an Ariens 13 hp 926 model into my Ariens Platinum. It was purchased new from my dealer with part # AP00258451. It is 14" dia.

You are correct it does throw exceptionally well. Thanks for your expertise and experience which helped me decide to go for this great upgrade.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
88 Posts
The simple answer is, the more blades on the impeller increases the impeller weight. The engine needs to drive the machine and spin the auger and, the impeller. That's a lot of work on the engine and creates a baseline. Reducing impeller count actually increased performance because it allowed the engine to transfer the energy saved from weight to RPMs. Faster RPMs increase throw.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,288 Posts
The simple answer is, the more blades on the impeller increases the impeller weight. The engine needs to drive the machine and spin the auger and, the impeller. That's a lot of work on the engine and creates a baseline. Reducing impeller count actually increased performance because it allowed the engine to transfer the energy saved from weight to RPMs. Faster RPMs increase throw.

sorry but the weight doesnt mean squat when it comes to throw distance its either turn the rpm or it doesnt



sadly the video of the 924 1336 pro with the ohv358cc 13 hp tec really was 11 hp with the 6 blade impeller with an impeller kit on it throwing snow 65 feet is not on youtube anymore the 6 blade is better then a 3 or a 4
the newer ariens have a higher impeller rpm and a tighter drum vs the older ariens thats why they throw well even with a 3 blade
my 2005 1332 was rated at 1209 impeller rpm as were most ariens of that era it was a 4 blade when measured it was around 1050 and was 1090 ish at 3725 rpm on the ohv 358cc 11 hp tec threw about the same as my 28 inch 414cc kitted 3825 rpm 3 blade ariens but running less impeller rpm

the newer pros are said to be 1120
the sho 1083
reg 1010
my reg was1020ish now at 3825 rpm its 1111 ish
my rust bucket st824 is 1090 @ 3725 that throws 45 to almost 50 feet they were rated to throw 25 feet as i recall
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Top